|
To read a copy of this
appeal, click here
New Political Gimmick for 3-year Medical course for Rural
Doctors: PBT's petition admitted by the Delhi High Court
To read a copy of this petition, click
here
New Laws for "Medical Negligence" in India: Implications of the
Supreme Court judgment in "Anuradha Saha" Death Case
On 7th August 2009, the
Supreme Court of India (SC) passed the final verdict in the
“Anuradha Saha”
wrongful death case (click here
to see the entire judgment).
The Supreme Court has held four eminent Kolkata doctors
(Sukumar Mukherjee, Abani Roychowdhury, Baidyanath Halder and
Balaram Prasad) and Advanced Medicare Research Institute (AMRI), a
premier private hospital in Kolkata, responsible for causing death
of Anuradha Saha from medical negligence.
The SC has sent the case back to the National Consumer
Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) solely to determine the
quantum of compensation (out of a claim of Rs. 77.7 crore plus
interests for the past 11 years) that these doctors and hospital
must now pay for causing death of Anuradha Saha.
In addition, the SC has also imposed a penalty of Rs. 5 lakh
and Rs. 1 lakh against AMRI hospital and Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee,
respectively, for their stance.
The Apex Court has made numerous
observations in this historic judgment that will have far-reaching
consequences for deciding cases against doctors and hospitals in
India. The SC has also set categorical rules about “patients’
rights” and duty of the doctors/hospitals toward their patients in
this judgment. Failure of any of the new rules, as established by
the Apex Court in the Anuradha death case, would amount to “medical
negligence” in India. Article 141 of the Indian Constitution
mandates that the law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding
on all courts within the territory. All future cases of “medical
negligence” must be decided after considering the views expressed by
the SC in the “Anuradha Saha” death case. The members of the medical
community are also urged to learn the specific new laws for medical
negligence in view of this historic judgment.
To
view the most important points that have emerged from this judgment
and its possible significance for “medical negligence”,
click
here
Follow us on
FACEBOOK
|